<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only darkness has the power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eatyourgreens.org.uk/archives/2007/08/only_darkness_h.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eatyourgreens.org.uk/archives/2007/08/only_darkness_h.html</link>
	<description>Actually, I am a rocket scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 09:21:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otto</title>
		<link>http://eatyourgreens.org.uk/archives/2007/08/only_darkness_h.html/comment-page-1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Otto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatyourgreens.org.uk/?p=84#comment-95</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I do wonder, though, how many people will want to use the microformat if it requires rewriting the URLs on your web site? It seems contrary to the principle that microformats are simple and easy to use.&lt;/em&gt;

Well, &quot;simple to use&quot; is relative, isn&#039;t it? I mean, if MT supported rewriting out of the box, with just a checkbox in MT, then you wouldn&#039;t have nearly as much problem with this. WordPress does it with a simple radio checkbox, why doesn&#039;t Movable Type?

I agree that the idea of using the last hunk of the URL sucks, however, rel-tag was designed to work with existing implementations. The tag implementation was basically an informal one developed by Technorati and others back in the day. The rel-tag microformat simply adopted existing practice. And this is what microformats are generally all about, taking existing examples of ways of doing things on the web and then semi-formalizing them. Thus the widest audience is reached easily.

Still, there needs to be alternative implementation, I agree. But &quot;simple and easy&quot; isn&#039;t a fault with the microformat, because for other platforms, it pretty much is simple and easy.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I do wonder, though, how many people will want to use the microformat if it requires rewriting the URLs on your web site? It seems contrary to the principle that microformats are simple and easy to use.</em></p>
<p>Well, &#8220;simple to use&#8221; is relative, isn&#8217;t it? I mean, if MT supported rewriting out of the box, with just a checkbox in MT, then you wouldn&#8217;t have nearly as much problem with this. WordPress does it with a simple radio checkbox, why doesn&#8217;t Movable Type?</p>
<p>I agree that the idea of using the last hunk of the URL sucks, however, rel-tag was designed to work with existing implementations. The tag implementation was basically an informal one developed by Technorati and others back in the day. The rel-tag microformat simply adopted existing practice. And this is what microformats are generally all about, taking existing examples of ways of doing things on the web and then semi-formalizing them. Thus the widest audience is reached easily.</p>
<p>Still, there needs to be alternative implementation, I agree. But &#8220;simple and easy&#8221; isn&#8217;t a fault with the microformat, because for other platforms, it pretty much is simple and easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Mabbett</title>
		<link>http://eatyourgreens.org.uk/archives/2007/08/only_darkness_h.html/comment-page-1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Mabbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatyourgreens.org.uk/?p=84#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Quite. I&#039;ve started some work (http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag-other-evidence) to gather evidence of other tagging behaviours, in the hope of getting backing for supporting them with microformats.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite. I&#8217;ve started some work (<a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag-other-evidence" rel="nofollow">http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag-other-evidence</a>) to gather evidence of other tagging behaviours, in the hope of getting backing for supporting them with microformats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

